Espen fadnes biography of abraham
•
The association between healthy diet indicator and phytochemical index with prostate cancer odds ratio: a case-control study
- Research
- Open access
- Published:
- Marzieh Mahmoodi1,2na1,
- Farzaneh MohammadiORCID: 1,2na1,
- Milad Rajabzadeh-dehkordiORCID: 1,3,
- Yahya Jalilpiran4,
- Maede Makhtoomi1,5,
- Mehran NouriORCID: 6 &
- …
- Shiva FaghihORCID: 3
Journal of Health, Population and Nutritionvolume 43, Article number: () Cite this article
Accesses
12 Altmetric
Metrics details
Abstract
Background and objective
Healthy diets and diets rich in phytochemicals can have health-promoting benefits in prostate cancer. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the possible association between Healthy Diet Indicator (HDI) and Phytochemical Index (PI) with prostate cancer odds ratio.
Methods
This is a case-control study conducted in Shiraz, Iran, involving 62 newly diagnosed prostate cancer cases and 63 hospital-based controls. The study collected demographic and anthropometric data, as well as dietary intake information via a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. Logistic regression models were employed to evaluate the association between HDI and PI with prostate cancer.
Results
The study included participants and found th
•
Published in final edited form as: Clin Nutr ESPEN. Mar 1;– doi: /
Abstract
Background and Aims:
The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility (ability to recruit participants and develop the month intervention), acceptability (retention of participants in the intervention), and impact on systemic inflammation and Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII®) scores over a month DII-based intervention.
Methods:
Adults were recruited to participate in a self-selection trial (intervention: n=61, in-person classes; control: n=34, newsletters). Classes included participatory cooking and dietary recommendations focused on consuming a plant-based diet rich in anti-inflammatory foods (spices, vegetables, etc.). Changes in markers of inflammation, lipids, and DII were analyzed using general linear models with repeated measurements.
Results:
At 3 months, intervention participants had significantly lower DII scores (−±) compared to controls (−±) (p<); but not at 12 months (P=). The only biomarker to approach a significant group effect or group-by-time interaction was CRP (P= for the group-by-time interaction). CRP decreased by − mg/L (95%CI=–, P=) at 12 months in the intervention group; no significant decrease was seen f
•